Cas πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆβ™»οΈβ™ΏοΈπŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ [main] is a user on dev.glitch.social. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse.
Cas πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆβ™»οΈβ™ΏοΈπŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ [main] @cassolotl

POST PRIVACY - who can see your post?

PUBLIC 🌏
Anyone can see and boost your post everywhere.

UNLISTED πŸ”“
(Replies are unlisted.)
βœ… Tagged people
βœ… Followers
βœ… On your profile
❌ Local and federated timelines
βœ… Boostable

FOLLOWERS ONLY πŸ”
βœ… Tagged people
βœ… Followers
❌ On your profile
❌ Local and federated timelines
❌ Boostable

DIRECT MESSAGE βœ‰οΈ
βœ… Tagged people
❌ Followers
❌ On your profile
❌ Local and federated timelines
❌ Boostable

Β· Web Β· 125 Β· 85

@cassolotl Can't see unlisted option πŸ€”

@cassolotl Just ignore. I found it by myself.

@cassolotl There's not only mastodon on the !fediverse. For instance don't send direct messages to a !gnusocial instance, the message may end being public.

@igor Most instances are updated to a version where direct and followers-only toots don't federate to instances that don't respect the privacy, I think? Did I get that right?

@cassolotl Maybe you're right, I don't follow the evolution of mastodon very closly. But when it comes to explain how it works, it's better to suggest that on the !fediverse, things are not simple to understand.

I see the mastodon followers-only postΒ  from the accounts I am following. I can repost them, using gnusocial. And then what happends then? I'm not sure at all.

@igor Innnteresting. Could you give me a URL of a followers-only post that you can see from GNU Social?

@cassolotl Firstly, I would have to search for it. I have to check the URL of the post outside of the gnusocial instance to understand if it's follower only. I have no way to tell this just reading the post.

@igor Ahh I get you. Well, obviously, if you're not up for making the effort then I totally understand! That could be a lot of searching.

What I was curious to find out is the version of Mastodon that the followers-only post that got to GNU Social came from. The version of Mastodon where private posts stopped federating to instances that couldn't respect the privacy was 2.0.0: github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/ - 5 months ago.

75% of known Mastodon instances and 88% of Mastodon users are on >=2.0.0.

@cassolotl By private post, you mean followers-only or direct message?

@cassolotl
And please everybody keep in mind:
Whatever you'll choose EVERY instance connected with yours will receive every single toot! So don't mix privacy settings of a toot with any secrecy! Your toot is in no way encrypted and authorities could read literally everything.

Visible by admin and VPS provider (thus NSA/bribers): all

@cassolotl kinda thought it might be worth a reminder that instance admins are able to operate above and beyond any controls, and then I got silly.

LB: William Shatner, Lance Ulanoff, and Jack Dorsey need to be on this too. XD

@mike (I just wanted to let you know that my recent subtoot-flavoured post was absolutely not about you - your post made me smile, and was informative without being negative or berating, which I really appreciated!)

@cassolotl hah I was just messing around a bit, glad you liked it.

Of course, if Mark ever sets up his own instance we'll need to revisit this topic again ...

@cassolotl 1) I like calling it "reach", not "privacy" 2) I'd add viewable by source/destination instance administrators all green

@cassolotl I can't produce such nice tables I am afraid :):):)

@feld I mean yes, I feel like that is obvious, because how else can admins ban the nazis? :D

@cassolotl
@feld
I don't think it's obvious to all users at all, especially non-technical users Mastodon tries to aim at.